YALL IT HAS ANOTHER POST (PLEASE BAN @SILLYKITTYISBACK)

***EDIT:*** They've deleted their posts or the posts have been removed and ITS STILL SLANDERING ME ABOUT MY PATTERN!!!! https://kandipad.com/pattern/candian-lynx-charm-14090629 NAW NOW ITS DOING COMMISSIONS THIS IS ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING. I will NOT be posting the images on this forum but if you want to see TW!!!!!!!!! check her most recent post (My response below) You're friendly Moderator #6 -St4rz/Lynx This Is No Longer Criticism — It’s Harassment and Rule-Breaking At this point, the situation has gone far beyond “disliking Hatsune Miku” or debating character originality. What’s being posted now is harassment, inappropriate content, and behavior that directly violates the rules of most creative and youth-adjacent platforms—especially a Kandi-making website, which is meant to be a safe, inclusive space. Posting deliberately inappropriate drawings, using shock value, and attaching them to targeted hate toward a character or fandom is not criticism. It is provocation. It contributes nothing to discussion, creativity, or art. It exists solely to upset people and derail the community. Hating a Character Does NOT Justify Inappropriate Content You are allowed to dislike Hatsune Miku. You are allowed to critique media. You are not allowed to: Post sexually inappropriate material in general community forums Target fandoms with disturbing imagery Normalize or joke about harmful behavior Use shock content to bully others out of shared spaces That isn’t “free speech.” That’s abusing a platform and the people on it. Just to remind you: The “Mabel Pines Ripoff” Claim Still Has No Standing Even putting the inappropriate art aside, the original claim still fails completely. Hatsune Miku is a vocal synthesis instrument and virtual idol released in 2007 Mabel Pines debuted in 2012 Miku does not originate from a TV narrative, has no canonical personality, and is shaped by users, not writers Similar energy or “quirkiness” is not ownership, plagiarism, or copyright Repeating a false claim louder—especially while behaving badly—does not make it true. It only undermines the credibility of the person making it. Behavior Affects Credibility When someone resorts to posting disturbing imagery, making extreme statements, or deliberately crossing boundaries, they lose credibility immediately. That kind of conduct signals that the goal is attention and conflict—not truth, discussion, or critique. At this point, the behavior being displayed says far more about the person posting than about Hatsune Miku or her fans. This Is a Community Issue Now Public forums—especially ones with younger users—have rules for a reason. Posting content meant to shock or upset others violates the spirit and the letter of those rules. Communities thrive on respect, creativity, and shared enjoyment, not hostility and provocation. This kind of behavior is exactly why moderation exists. Conclusion Disliking Hatsune Miku is allowed. Critiquing media is allowed. Harassment, inappropriate content, and disruptive behavior are not. Hatsune Miku is not a ripoff of Mabel Pines by any factual, creative, or legal standard. The attempt to push that claim through offensive behavior only weakens it further. If the argument had merit, it wouldn’t need shock tactics to stand.