Free will vs determinism

From Google ai but whatever Brief summary for yall that don't know 1. Determinism (No Free Will) Hard Determinism: The belief that every single physical event—including human thoughts and actions—is completely dictated by the laws of nature and prior events. Under this view, if you could rewind time to the exact moment before a choice, you would always make the exact same decision. Your choices feel free, but they are an illusion; our brains are just obeying the unbreakable rules of physics. Theistic Determinism: The belief that an all-knowing, all-powerful deity has already ordained everything that will ever happen. 2. Libertarianism (Free Will) Also known as Incompatibilism, this view states that free will and determinism cannot logically coexist. Libertarians believe that humans possess the capacity to make genuine, uncoerced choices that are not strictly necessitated by past events. They argue we are the ultimate "cause" of our own actions and that "we could have done otherwise" if placed in the exact same scenario. 3. Compatibilism (The Middle Ground) Compatibilists argue that both free will and determinism can exist together. They redefine what free will means: rather than requiring actions to be completely random or uncaused, they argue a choice is "free" as long as it is internally motivated by your own desires, beliefs, and character, without external coercion Gang which one is logically valid in your opinion/you agree with :3 From a purely philosophical stance I am a hard determinist